Supreme Court refused to hear case about eminent domain abuse in New York

With the blessing of officials from the Village of Port Chester, a politically connected developer approached Didden and his partner with an offer they couldn’t refuse.  Because Didden planned to build a CVS on his property—land the developer coveted for a Walgreens—the developer demanded $800,000 from Didden to make him “go away” or ordered Didden to give him an unearned 50 percent stake in the CVS development.  If Didden refused, the developer would have the Village of Port Chester condemn the land for his private use.  Didden rejected the bold-faced extortion.  The very next day the Village of Port Chester condemned Didden’s property through eminent domain so it could hand it over to the developer who made the threat.


Date Filed

December 12, 2006

Case Status



Media Contact

Scroll To

Case Team

Timeline and Case Documents

Sign up to receive IJ's biweekly digital magazine, Liberty & Law along with breaking updates about our fight to protect the rights of all Americans.